Posted in Applied Mathematicsematics

Daniel J. Velleman's American Mathematical Monthly, volume 117, number 1, january PDF

By Daniel J. Velleman

Show description

Read Online or Download American Mathematical Monthly, volume 117, number 1, january 2010 PDF

Best applied mathematicsematics books

Download e-book for kindle: Synthesis of Yoga I - II (The Complete Works of Sri by Sri Aurobindo

"Truth of philosophy is of a in simple terms theoretical worth except it may be lived, and we've consequently attempted within the Synthesis of Yoga to reach at a synthetical view of the foundations and techniques of some of the strains of religious strength of will and how during which they could result in an quintessential divine existence within the human existence".

Ubuntu Netbooks: The Path to Low-Cost Computing (Beginning) by Sander van Vugt PDF

You’ve made the bounce and feature bought your first netbook—a small desktop that's ideal for connecting to the net, instant communications, and dealing with cloud applications—including Google doctors, Flickr, cellular Me, etc. in keeping with the writer of Linux, Linux Torvalds, netbooks are “are fairly simply laptops performed right‘.

Download e-book for kindle: Cocaine Abuse: Behavior, Pharmacology, and Clinical by Stephen T. Higgins

Cocaine abuse is still an important public sickness and contributes to a lot of our most annoying social difficulties, together with the unfold of infectious ailment, crime, violence, and neonatal drug publicity. Cocaine abuse effects from a fancy interaction of behavioral, pharmacological, and neurobiological determinants.

Extra resources for American Mathematical Monthly, volume 117, number 1, january 2010

Sample text

In approval voting systems, each voter indicates approval or disapproval for each candidate or option (we use the term platform), and the platform with the most approval votes wins. What conditions guarantee that there will be a platform with the approval of at least half (or all) the voters? Without introducing any further assumptions, one can only reach trivial conclusions, but in many situations, there is some underlying property of the set of platforms and votes that allows for more interesting results.

N}, I is good, and |J | = m. Let g be the number of good sets. Since every good set is of size d + 1 and extends to an m-element n−d−1 n−d−1 subset of {1, 2, . . , n} in m−d−1 ways, we have N = g m−d−1 . On the other hand, every m-element set J ⊆ {1, 2, . . , n} includes at least one k-element set K with k i∈K Ai = ∅ (because S is (k, m)-agreeable), and K in turn includes d+1 good sets. k n k n m , and hence g ≥ d+1 , as desired. Thus N ≥ d+1 m d+1 d+1 For d = 1, Theorem 10 gives a worse bound than Theorem 8, and hence for d ≥ 2, the bound is most likely not best possible.

Since C1 ∪ C2 ∪ · · · ∪ Ck−1 is colored using k − 1 colors, it includes no clique of size k, and hence, |C1 ∪ C2 ∪ · · · ∪ Ck−1 | ≤ m − 1. January 2010] VOTING IN AGREEABLE SOCIETIES 33 It follows that |Ck−1 | ≤ q, for otherwise |C1 ∪ C2 ∪ · · · ∪ Ck−1 | ≥ (k − 1)(q + 1) ≥ (k − 1)q + ρ + 1 = m, a contradiction. Thus |Ci | ≤ q for each i ≥ k and χ k−1 |Ci | + n= i=1 |Ci | ≤ m − 1 + (χ − k + 1)q i=k = (k − 1)q + ρ + (χ − k + 1)q = χq + ρ, as desired. Theorem 8. Let 2 ≤ k ≤ m. If G is the agreement graph of a (k, m)-agreeable linear society and q, ρ are defined by the division with remainder: m − 1 = (k − 1)q + ρ, ρ ≤ k − 2, then the clique number satisfies: ω(G) ≥ n−ρ , q and this bound is best possible.

Download PDF sample

American Mathematical Monthly, volume 117, number 1, january 2010 by Daniel J. Velleman

by Anthony

Rated 4.75 of 5 – based on 46 votes